My expertise on digital platforms, fandom, and celebrity was requested by Jenna Drenten, Chair of the Marketing Department at Loyola University Chicago, to help uncover Cameo’s place in the digital fan-scape. We conducted secondary research and original research, consisting of: textual and visual analysis of 765 Cameo videos and customer reviews, along with a macro analysis of the architecture of Cameo, through the lens of digital ventriloquism. We developed the concept “paid-puppeteering,” which refers to the strategic performance tactics of the talent, (i.e. service providers) on Cameo. This research is useful because:
The women of Real Housewives – and reality stars in general – are often denigrated. I wanted to show that we should respect this kind of talent because their media skills are unmatched – so much so – they can keep fans and followers in spite of bad press and even become President of the U.S. Employing various research methods (critical discourse & visual analysis of social media, frame analysis of each series, structured interviews with fans, and semi-structured interviews with the women of Real Housewives), I developed the concept emotional camping. It borrows from Arlie Hochschild and Susan Sontag’s work to explain the legitimate labor, (i.e. self-branding & identity work) reality stars do to keep their image and brand relevant in the attention economy. This work is useful because:
My University of Illinois at Chicago colleague, June Mia and I wanted to study celebrities from both sides of the aisle who were backing political candidates on Instagram during the 2020 U.S. Presidential election. Combining social identity theory & performance theory, we conducted a textual discourse analysis of the posts and stories of 20 celebrity Republicans and 20 celebrity Democrats. Our work shows how celebrity Republicans and Democrats aligned their personal brands with the brand of their chosen political party. This work is useful because:
Brands are vehicles for marketing cultural expression (Holt & Cameron, 2010). As a sociologist and media scholar, I view reality TV and social media as mirrors of our cultural values. As a woman, and longtime Bachelor viewer, I wanted to examine cultural expressions of femininity put forth by The Bachelor franchise. Most academic research on the franchise focuses on TV content, so I wanted to move the needle forward by analyzing social content. Focusing my attention on the women of The Bachelorette, I conducted a critical visual & textual analysis of their Instagram to gage how they curated their brand to appeal to fans, the franchise, and other brands for sponsorships. This research is useful because:
Academic research on media too often falls under “media effects” which unfairly assumes that people are passive and directly impacted by the things they consume, i.e. violent video games make people violent. I utilize a cultural approach to media, which adds important nuance to dismantle this type of thinking. Aiming to remove the “guilty” from guilty pleasure media, I wanted to understand the characteristics and motivations of Real Housewives fans, whom I know don’t throw wine in people’s faces just because they saw someone do it on the show. In two different studies, across time, via in-depth interviews and focus groups, I spoke with fans of these shows. This research is useful because:
Fans are everything. In celebrity studies, celebrities or brands are the result of a transaction between three things: (i) the face, (ii) the cultural intermediaries who curate that face, (iii) and fans. Take the fans out of this equation & you have nothing. Just look at #FreeBritney – fans really do make shit happen. My friends and I are die-hard Beverly Hills, 90210 fans and we wanted a reboot with the OGs. (The 2008 reboot doesn’t count. Ask any self-respecting fan). So, we sat down, wrote the reboot of our dreams, and created an Instagram (@90210Reunion) to share with fellow fans. Our work was well received and we even grew our following to 30K. Through an auto-ethnography of fan accounts on Instagram and interviews w/ other fan creators, I analyzed how this community worked to make the 2019 BH 90210 reunion happen. This research is useful because:
Media framing leads us to make judgments and think in certain ways about issues, events, and concepts. I wanted to show that media framing of the rich plays into how people think about wealth & inequality. I conducted a rigorous frame analysis of the Real Housewives franchise to show how producers conveniently package the women of the series so we make class-based judgments about the rich in general. In addition to the extensive frame analysis of each series in the franchise, across time, I also interviewed former producers and editors of the series. Ultimately, the women are presented through five frames: Bling Frame, Hustler Frame, ‘Maybe we are white trash’ Frame, ‘You’re a Hypocrite’ Frame, and the Postfeminist Meta-Frame – which can overlap and appear simultaneously. In subsequent interviews with fans, they directly called up these media frames in their responses to questions about the rich and economic inequality – which means these media frames do play a role in how we think about bigger social issues. This research is useful because:
I wanted to understand the globalization of pop culture products and transcend the typical discussions of “glocal-ization” and “cultural homogenization.” After conducting extensive secondary research on global cultural products, using qualitative textual analysis, I analyzed the content and formats of the most popular reality shows in the U.S. and China – distinct in terms of political order, rule of law, and cultural practices. I found that reality TV, while different in form and content, is used the same way in each country for similar reasons. This research matters because:
Copyright © 2018 eviepsarras.com - All Rights Reserved.
Powered by GoDaddy